material awareness by James Pierce CHI'09
Products as Agents to appear in CHI2016
2016年12月20日 星期二
2016年12月13日 星期二
week 14. pure design research
1. student presentation on "annotated portfolios"
2. Pure design research
"useless", "unusable", "non-functional" design
Ref:
Counterfunctional things
3. Lab, field, showroom methods review
Ref:
Interaction design labels
2. Pure design research
"useless", "unusable", "non-functional" design
Ref:
Counterfunctional things
3. Lab, field, showroom methods review
Ref:
Interaction design labels
2016年12月5日 星期一
week 13. making public of design research
making public of design research. p. 742
1. An operational design product with a one-sentence description.
v.s.
2. A 10-page paper with a one-sentence design proposal.
how well is the "annotation"?
Exercise:
http://informationdesign2012.blogspot.tw/2016/12/week-13-annotated-portfolios-case.html
1. An operational design product with a one-sentence description.
v.s.
2. A 10-page paper with a one-sentence design proposal.
Chapter 7 in "Design Research Through Practice :
From the Lab, Field, and Showroom"how well is the "annotation"?
Exercise:
http://informationdesign2012.blogspot.tw/2016/12/week-13-annotated-portfolios-case.html
2016年11月29日 星期二
week 12. concept-things & annotated portfolios
annotated portfolios
Intermediate-level knowledge
The logic of annotated portfolios
questions:
How to annotate portfolios? What to annotate?
criticism? dialogues? phenomenology? interpretation? discourse?....
homework:
1. discuss and propose "guidelines" or "frameworks" for annotation
2. use the above guidelines to annotate at least two design artifacts.
deadline: Dec. 14, 2016
Intermediate-level knowledge
The logic of annotated portfolios
questions:
How to annotate portfolios? What to annotate?
criticism? dialogues? phenomenology? interpretation? discourse?....
homework:
1. discuss and propose "guidelines" or "frameworks" for annotation
2. use the above guidelines to annotate at least two design artifacts.
deadline: Dec. 14, 2016
2016年11月22日 星期二
week 11. Intermediate-level knowledge
1. p. 741
2. introducing "Intermediate-level Knowledge" by Lowgren
1. Jonas Löwgren. 2013. Annotated portfolios and other forms of intermediate-level knowledge.interactions 20, 1 (January 2013), 30-34.
2. Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 3, Article 23 (October 2012), 18 pages.
(pp. 23:11- 23:13)
4 constructs:
1. contextual grounding
2. horizontal grounding
3. vertical grounding
4. reflection, articulation, and abstraction
2. introducing "Intermediate-level Knowledge" by Lowgren
1. Jonas Löwgren. 2013. Annotated portfolios and other forms of intermediate-level knowledge.interactions 20, 1 (January 2013), 30-34.
2. Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 3, Article 23 (October 2012), 18 pages.
(pp. 23:11- 23:13)
4 constructs:
1. contextual grounding
2. horizontal grounding
3. vertical grounding
4. reflection, articulation, and abstraction
2016年11月1日 星期二
week 8. student presentation & perceptual crossing
student presentation
Perceptual crossing:
1. Designing for perceptual crossing to improve user involvement
2. Designing for Perceptual Crossing: Applying and Evaluating Design Notions
3. Designing for perceptual crossing: designing and comparing three behaviors
Extra experiment:
http://ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/694/298
Perceptual crossing:
1. Designing for perceptual crossing to improve user involvement
2. Designing for Perceptual Crossing: Applying and Evaluating Design Notions
3. Designing for perceptual crossing: designing and comparing three behaviors
Extra experiment:
http://ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/694/298
訂閱：
文章 (Atom)